digging (into) vintage: Jean Patou Sublime, 1992

Posted on

3172676

Perfumer Jean Kerléo.

Somewhere in the ’90s the chypre fell off the radar. Blame the IFRA, blame Angel (also 1992), blame whoever you like. It went quietly from the pinnacle of chic to over-the-hill faster than you can say ‘mousse de chêne.’

Why and how to restrict perfume materials is a popular if confusing debate today, but in the 70s-90s the discussion of the hazards of aromachemicals and botanicals took place behind closed-doors. The general public didn’t know what went into perfumes in the first place or who made them, so discussions about restricting oakmoss or refining bergamot had little significance. They did have a stifling effect on perfume composition, though it might not have been readily apparent in 1992.

Chypre perfumes tend to have a strong presence and it’s easy to characterize the eras of the chypre. The ur-chypre by Coty and the seminal chypre by Guerlain, Mitsouko. The animalic chypres of the ’40s (eg. Miss Dior). The moonlit floral chypres of the ’50s (Jolie Madame.) The aldehydic and green chypres of the ’60s (Calèche and YSL Y ), the liberated chypres of the ’70s (Aromatics Elixir and Diorella) and the roaring rose chypres of the ’80s (La Nuit and Parfum de Peau).

But the chypre seemed to lose its identity in the ’90s. It was seen as both suffocating and passé when compared to the self-effacing new style of ’90s perfumes and their notes of air, water, light and apology. After the loud florals and orientals of the ’80s, modernity in perfume came to be synonymous with minimalism and the chypre became synonymous with old-fashioned. Traditional perfumes became outmoded and ‘classical’ perfumery started to seem like bad Hollywood Regency–stylistically overburdened yet without the saving grace of true kitsch.

The 1990s chypre-style, if there was one, played with the chypre’s affinity for fruit notes. YSL Yvresse (Champagne) 1992, Nina Ricci Deci Delà 1994 and Cartier So Pretty 1995 split the difference between the chypre and sweet fruity-florals of the day. Hybrids such as these aimed for the best of both worlds. The risk was that they would simply create a mash-up of notes and materials from each genre—that they’d lack synergy. These three were famously successful but have been discontinued, I suppose pointing out another risk: that even a successful hybrid might not be popular enough to stay afloat.

Sublime has a finger in so many different pies that the term hybrid doesn’t quite capture it. Chypre? Oriental? Woody Floral? Yes, and then some. I think of it as a Resinous Fruity Woody-Floral Chypre. Cop-out? Sure, I don’t deny it.

Powder-over-woods creates a sweet-tart dynamic similar to the vetiver-vanilla dissonance of Habanita, but in Sublime it is quieter, less aggressive. The citric topnotes are lusher in feel than the curt bergamot top of many older chypres, though the perfume’s pace is utterly classical. Atypical for a ’90s perfume, the basenotes are the most complex part of the perfume and the long-arc of the drydown is the giveaway that Sublime will only dip its toe into the fruity-floral style that was gaining momentum in the 1990s. Tightly layered woods are a signature of Kerleo’s style (see 1000 for Patou) and in Sublime, Kerleo coats them in a buttery amber glaze that extends the reach of the peachy heartnotes and gives the perfume a sunset glow. The understated drydown has the diaphanous ‘give’ of woody orientals like Vol de Nuit and Bois des Isles yet never loses coherence.

It’s no surprise that Sublime didn’t become better known. It wasn’t bad–not by a longshot–but it might have been seen as outmoded when held to the growingly detached, hygienic aesthetic that would come to define the 1990s. Viewed on its own merits, Sublime is a history lesson on the genre by one of the 20th century’s strongest classicists and historians. Whether you like traditional chypres or not, if you’d like a tour through the history of French perfumery in a single bottle, try vintage Sublime. It illustrates the techniques and ideals of a century of perfumery. And who better to conduct the tour than Kerléo, founder of Osmothèque?

 

(Image of Lee Liberace, source unknown.)

  • Share

0 Comments

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.